The Interoceanic Highway has recently connected Rio de Janiero in Brazil to three Pacific Ocean ports in Peru. The 2,600km road, which passes through the centre of the Amazon rainforest and traverses the Andes mountains, has taken almost five years to complete at a cost of US$1.6bn.
Despite the obvious commercial advantages, such as increased integration between the countries, the opening up of new markets and lower transport costs, there are also social and environmental issues. Increased migration, threats to uncontacted indigenous peoples, the potential for increased deforestation, soil erosion and destruction of animal habitat are just a few.
The Argentina Independent hit the streets of Buenos Aires to find out how much people know about the new highway, and their thoughts on the commercial benefits versus the environmental costs.
Photos by Priscilla Pompa
Martin Juarez, 47, clothing company supervisor, Palermo
I think it is progress. Progress, but with consequences. There have been similar projects in Argentina where the environment has been damaged but the project is seen as progress. For example, in Argentina, the dams on the Rio Paraná, and Itaipú in Brazil. They flooded huge areas of forest, but it was seen as worthwhile due to the large amount of clean energy that is produced. And I can see the commercial benefits of this project, but also, it does caused damage to the habitat of many species of animals and I think there is risk of further development in remote areas. It is easy to understand it being built due to the money involved, and so I am receptive to those in charge as to how they will ensure the environment is cared for in the future.
Lucas Garelik, 23, student, Vicente López, Buenos Aires province
They built a road from Rio to the Pacific? That would certainly be good for the economy, both between Brazil and Peru, and it helps the transport of goods to the oceans. But it not good for the environment, as it also increases access to the Amazon for logging, so I think it will increase deforestation in the area.
Mabel Cantena, 60, teacher, Palermo
I think that it is not good for the flora and fauna in the rainforest – they will certainly suffer. I don’t like the politics that surrounds such decisions. Of course, commerce will benefit hugely from the new road, but only in the short term. And politicians only think in the short term. They don’t think of the long term environmental damage being caused, and of our children and our grand children. It will make some people very wealthy for the next few years and then people will realise the environmental damage that has been caused.
Rodrigo Vargas, 35, industrial engineer, on holiday from Santiago de Chile
There are economic benefits but it could also cause development in the area. There could be small towns that form and grow, which could be bad from an environmental point of view. Whether the road is good or not depends. The environment is the main concern, and it is important that any impact of the road is mitigated, and that rules and regulations are put into place that limit the damage. For example, rules that limit the growth of villages and towns along the road. The road is now built, and I think that as long as they take care of the environment now then it will be ok.
Martina Cormick, 17, student, Caballito
I didn’t know about this – are they building it or it is finished? Well, what is done is done. I don’t think that what has happened is good and I think it will cause damage to the environment, but there is no point in arguing about it after it has happened. Now, it is important that we make the most of the road now it is built, and make sure that commerce does increase between Brazil and Peru as planned.