José Pedraza, head of the Railway Workers’ Union (UF), was sentenced yesterday to 15 years in prison for the murder of Partido Obrero (PO) activist Mariano Ferreyra in 2010. Another 13 people were convicted, and three were acquitted.

Flags calling for justice in the trial of Mariano Ferreyra’s murder. (Photo: Patricio Murphy)
Mariano Ferreyra was killed on 20th October 2010, during a protest in which left-wing PO activists were supporting outsourced contract workers at the Roca train line who were demanding better conditions and the reincorporation of laid off workers. The protesters were met near the Avellaneda train station by a group of UF thugs, who threatened them and threw stones at them. As the protesters decided to end their action, the UF gang opened fire, killing Ferreyra and leaving three other protesters wounded.
Pedraza’s right-hand man at UF, Juan Carlos ‘Gallego’ Fernández, was also sentenced to 15 years in prison, while those accused of firing the gun that killed Ferreyra, barrabravas Cristian Favale and Gabriel ‘Payaso’ Sánchez, as well as unionist Pablo Díaz, who was considered to have led the UF gang, will serve an 18-year sentence.
The verdict for the trial that started in August last year was read on Friday after 6.30pm, over an hour and a half later than expected, after a long and tense wait. Representatives from political parties and human rights organisations filled the court, while protesters held a day-long vigil outside, holding banners that read ‘Justice for Mariano’ and ‘Life [sentence] for Pedraza’.
Although the full ruling will be known on 17th June, the head of the court, judge Horacio Días, spent over an hour explaining the grounds for the decision, before finally reading the verdict. In his explanation, Días stated that while there was no “direct evidence” of Pedraza’s involvement, there were “hints” that indicated his participation in the murder in order to protect his own political and economic interests. However, they considered that there was not enough evidence to suggest that Pedraza had explicitly ordered the shooters to kill Ferreyra, thus rejecting the plaintiff’s demand that he be charged with instigating the murder. Pedraza will also have to face charges for attempting to bribe judges in order to free UF members implicated in the murder.
The judges found that the movilisation of UF workers on 20th October 2010 had not been “spontaneous”, and that they were able to act with impunity as they counted with the complicity of the Federal Police, which had “freed” the area. Four policemen received sentences of between two and 10 years, while one was acquitted and another one was let off with a $12,500 fine.
Other union delegates were sentenced to between eight and 11 years in jail for their roles in the murder, and two railway workers were acquitted.
The judges dismissed the claims by the surviving victims’ legal team regarding Labour Minister Carlos Tomada’s alleged involvement. A recorded telephone conversation between Pedraza and Tomada, in which the latter justifies himself for not having returned “some 40 calls” from the union leader, shows that the minister was “trying to get rid of [Pedraza]” rather than collaborating with him, according to Días.

Jose Pedraza enters the courtroom at the beginning of the trial (Photo: Patricio Murphy)
The reactions to the verdict were mixed. PO leader Jorge Altamira was not satisfied with the ruling, which he considered to be “completely contradictory”. “[The ruling] is full of incredible fallacies and fails to investigate the responsibility of one of the state’s branches, in order to save [labour] minister Carlos Tomada and to disassociate the police. The ruling exposes things in a way in which it reveals the existence of a criminal plan and then tries to deny it (…) [It] is not up to the standard demanded by Argentine society.”
Horacio Verbitsky, president of the Centre for Legal and Social Studies (CELS) which acted as Ferreyra’s mother’s legal representative, said instead that “[The judge's] exposition was very serious and with a very clear, direct language, laid out logically and well-founded. We had requested a life sentence [for Pedraza] for instigation and first-degree murder. There are technical details, and to be able to give a well-founded opinion we must read the full ruling, but 15 years for Pedraza is not a minor sentence. For the family everything is insufficient and, while we don’t agree with everything, we think it’s a very important ruling.”
Pablo Ferreyra, Mariano’s brother, took to Twitter yesterday to express the family’s feelings after the ruling. He said that the position of the family is “positive”, adding that “It’s the satisfaction of knowing that Pedraza is responsible for Mariano’s cruel murder and he’s sentenced to 15 years. A ruling that can be improved, until we have the grounds [for the decision] we will keep acting with the sensibility we’ve had since the very beginning and we’ll appeal everything that we find should be improved. But, as hours go by, we feel fine because the business-unionists, the thugs, and the police are being jointly punished, respecting the idea of one plan put together from the top of the UF. The underlying issues of tercerización [outsourcing of employees], police corruption, and impunity can find a limit thanks to this sentence. There are things to highlight, others to question. We only ask for respect for our opinions, and the time to mature this ruling in our heads. Let’s not lose sight of the historical importance of this day… The day Pedraza was sentenced for the murder of Mariano Ferreyra.”